Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

Ok...

I would suggest any specific feedback you have, you should post to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291815, which is where the original contribution and discussion of this API was done.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

Inactive hide details for Sergey Prigogin ---05/12/2010 06:04:04 PM---On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Chris Recoskie <recoskieSergey Prigogin ---05/12/2010 06:04:04 PM---On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I understand the chan


From:
Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>

To:
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
05/12/2010 06:04 PM

Subject:
Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

Sent by:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    I understand the changes you are suggesting, but what I'm not sure I understand is whether you are saying that the interfaces should not go in at all until these things are resolved, or whether the interfaces stay in but don't get modified to incorporate your suggestions until later.

The interface should not go in in its current form. 

    The APIs are all provisional. They can be changed as needed. I'm pretty sure IBM is the only client of them right now. If there are improvements that can be made to the API or the documentation surrounding them I am happy to make them.

    We have our new version of our product coming out in the fall that is going to be based on Helios, so I will need those changes in time for that. We won't be able to wait until the next simultaneous release in 2011 for them.



    ===========================
    Chris Recoskie
    Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
    IBM Toronto


-sergey 
    Inactive hide details for Sergey Prigogin ---05/12/2010 05:31:21 PM---IFilesystemUtility interface requires serious work in terSergey Prigogin ---05/12/2010 05:31:21 PM---IFilesystemUtility interface requires serious work in terms of writing clear unambiguous specificati

    From:
    Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>

    To:
    "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

    Date:
    05/12/2010 05:31 PM

    Subject:
    Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

    Sent by:
    cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



    IFilesystemUtility interface requires serious work in terms of writing clear unambiguous specifications for all its methods and, possibly, changing method names to match those descriptions. The name of the interface should be more specific. A capitalization mismatch between IFilesystemUtility and FileSystemUtility has to be fixed. A prudent thing to do is to postpone these changes until after 7.0.

    -sergey

    On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Chris Recoskie <    recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        Well I need some direction on what is the solution.

        Do I need to port FilesystemUtilityManager, etc. to 6.0.x as well? Or is it enough for the since tags to be 5.2? Or what exactly?



        ===========================
        Chris Recoskie
        Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
        IBM Toronto

        Inactive hide details for Doug Schaefer ---05/12/2010 11:01:08 AM---Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your comDoug Schaefer ---05/12/2010 11:01:08 AM---Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your commit is clearly in violation of our CDT 7.


From:
Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>

To:
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
05/12/2010 11:01 AM

Subject:
Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

Sent by:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


GIF image

GIF image

Back to the top