Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

[Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Well I need some direction on what is the solution.

Do I need to port FilesystemUtilityManager, etc. to 6.0.x as well? Or is it enough for the since tags to be 5.2? Or what exactly?

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

Doug Schaefer ---05/12/2010 11:01:08 AM---Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your commit is clearly in violation of our CDT 7.

From:	Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
To:	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	05/12/2010 11:01 AM
Subject:	Re: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes
Sent by:	cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Chris, I understand what you are trying to do, but your commit is clearly in violation of our CDT 7.0 guidelines and I need to join in the requests to either bring it into alignment or have it withdrawn. We are trying to rid ourselves of the sins of the past. I hope you understand.

Doug.

On May 12, 2010 10:20 AM, "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have removed the filter because it just hides the problem. The since tag should read @since 5.2, shouldn't it?

After all you cannot introduce API by adding it to 5.0.3 and then claim it has been part of 5.1.
 
Markus.



---

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:49 PM


> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] FYI, merged in a bunch of changes

Importance: Low


> What is the version of the .api_filters file of org.eclipse.cdt.core that you have.
> I'm running ...


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev