Re: [cdt-dev] Re: cdt mailing lists cleanup

[James Blackburn <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 23 April 2010 15:04, Alena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok they are gone.
>
> We have now have an extra one called cdt-commits that would have a
> message on every commit.
> I don't know yet what volume of this would be.
>
> For you commits please use format
> [12345] - fixed bla bla

Hmm. I prefer Bug 12345 which seems to be the standard for the platform too:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/Workspace/Committer_FAQ#What_comment_should_I_associate_with_a_commit.3F

Not that there's any need to copy the platform ;)

Cheers,
James

> where 12345 is the bug number,  I will try to automate adding a
> comment in a bugzilla for the corresponding commit
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Alena Laskavaia
> <elaskavaia.cdt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I found the following mailing lists
>> cdt-contrib-dev Development discussions on cdt-contrib component.
>> cdt-core-dev    CDT Core developers list.
>> cdt-core-inbox  cdt-core new bug list
>> cdt-debug-dev   CDT Debug developers list
>> cdt-dev         CDT General developers list.
>> cdt-doc-dev     CDT documentation developers list
>> cdt-doc-inbox   cdt-debug bugzilla inbox
>> cdt-patch               CDT patches and commits are posted to this list.
>> cdt-test-dev     CDT Testing developers list
>> cdt-ui-dev         CDT UI component developers list.
>>
>> Besides inboxes and cdt-dev I don't think any of the lists are used.
>> I propose get rid of them to not confuse people.
>> And add cdt-cvs for commits log which I am planning to use to automate
>> bugzilla to cvs links.
>> Any objections?
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>