[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?
|
Title: Re: [cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?
That is a screw up on my part.
I wasn't supposed to commit it, but the wrong button got
pressed
and partial stuff go it.
I'll revert now. Sorry about
that
Marc,
+1 I think it should go into CDT
6.0.
Is this partly in now? I just updated from CVS and my build is
broken with:
Description Resource
Path Location
Type
IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved
GDBControl.java
/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command
line 414 Java
Problem
IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved
GDBControl_7_0.java
/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command
line 552 Java Problem
The import
org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved
GDBControl_7_0.java
/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command
line 33 Java Problem
The import
org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.IGdbDebugConstants cannot be resolved
GDBControl.java
/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/service/command
line 32 Java Problem
- Ken
From: ext Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4
Jun 2009 17:00:45 +0200
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
[cdt-dev] Bug fix late in the release?
Hi,
DSF-GDB currently leaves GDB running after the debugged program
finishes.
It seems people find this confusing and may give
the impression that
DSF-GDB is not behaving well. I'm afraid it
may make some people
think it has bugs and dissuade them from using
it.
I wrote a patch to add a preference to control
this behavior, and make
the default be the same as CDI (kill GDB when
program terminates)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=234468 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=234468>
The preference is a UI change, and there is
some minor API changes
(two new methods and an interface
file).
I'm looking for some guidance if I should
commit this for 6.0 or not.
The
main point is that I don’t want to have some behavior that would
turn
off people from using DSF-GDB.
Thanks for any opinions.
Marc