|Re: [cdt-dev] RIP Wascana, Build System discussion|
Of course, a lot of work must go into the implementation of the extensions, to handle parsing and rewriting build scripts. But by being standard extensions to CDT, standard implementations could be written once (e.g. managed make + standard make, autotools, qmake, etc). Would it be appropriate for CDT to provide support like this?
This is exactly what I've been wishing for. -- /Jesper
Back to the top