[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [dsdp-pmc] RE: [cdt-dev] CDT and Galileo
|
I do want to make this happen, but I'm not a CDT committer.
So, in order to proceed, I'd like to ask the CDT community:
-
Are there any objectsions against contributing the mentioned features
to Galileo?
-
Any objections against renaming the two features (DSF, Memory View) as
proposed?
-
Any other comments, particularly from those working on
DSF / Memory Rendering?
- Vivian could you help me making it happen?
I think I could provide patches if needed, at least for
renaming the features, I haven't yet looked at what mechanisms the CDT uses for
contributing to Galileo (is it just manual copying of the feature ID's and
versions into the .build file when releasing a drop, or anything more
elaborate).
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project
Lead, DSDP PMC Member
I've stopped commenting on Galileo and its repo site. I don't want
to lose too many friends. If someone else wants to make this happen feel
free.
Doug.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Oberhuber, Martin
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi
Doug,
In my
opinion, the biggest benefit of the coordinated update site in the past was
that dependencies got automatically resolved.
The
"two-step-installation" scenario that you propose for "optional add-ons" to
CDT is flawed in several ways:
-
In the Remote
CDT case, I need to think about installing RSE in the first step BEFORE I
get the remote launcher in the 2nd step. Who would ever think about
this?
-
Optional
pieces are hard to find. As of Galileo M7, no additional repositories
are added when I install all of Galileo. I won't know the URL of the
CDT repository. This may be a current p2 bug, but on the other hand,
if all contributing project's repositories were added, how would I find
the CDT one?
-
DD-DSF and
RemoteCDT have been on Ganymede. Not having them in Galileo is a
regression. Clients may just expect finding it
there.
While I
agree that the Galileo site is going to become large, I cannot see how
adding the following would lead to any more confusion:
I took the freedom of remaming some of the features (memory view,
DSF, Remote Launch) for the sake of being more end-user consumable on a
coordinated site such as Galileo. But given that p2 finally sorts
contributions alphabetically, I would really appreciate seeing these
contributions on Galileo.
I do believe that having these on Galileo is important for the
whole DSDP message, thus I'm CC'ing the DSDP PMC.
And BTW, as I've mentioned before I'm in favor of re-introducing
the Ganymede category name of "Remote Access and Device Development"
rather than just Device Development as it's
today.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff,
Wind River
Target Management
Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
Hi Martin. We're treat the Galileo repository as a spring board
to the C/C++ IDE. All other features for the CDT, of which there are many,
are available in the CDT repository. We discussed removing remoteCDT from
Galileo, and it was a tough decision, but we've decided to treat it under
the same rules as the other CDT features. The Galileo repo is going to be
a disaster. There are way too many projects contributing to it and I don't
want to add to the mess.
At the end of the day, the EPP packages
should be the main vehicle where the user community gets their Eclipse
plugins. We need an Embedded Development IDE EPP package and that's
something I figure would come out of the DSDP Packaging project if it ever
gets off the ground.
Doug.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Oberhuber, Martin
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PS
DSF is also missing in Galileo.
DSF
and RemoteCDT missing are regressions compared to Ganymede, where they
have been in...
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff,
Wind River
Target Management
Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
Dear CDT gurus,
I just tried to get "All of Galileo
M7" and noticed some missing from CDT:
- Mylyn CDT connector missing in
Galileo -- should be in "Collaboration" category
- RemoteCDT Launcher missing in
Galileo -- should be in "Device Development"
category
Or are these
deliberately not in Galileo?
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev
mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-pmc
mailing list
dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc