[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "RemoteCDTLaunch"feature into CDT
|
Of course, we'd make this an optional feature for the CDT.
Related to this, I'm working on my EclipseCon tutorial for integrating
gnu cross development tools. If it turns out nice, I can add that to a
CDT GNU Cross Development feature that would include the remote launch.
Doug.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:13 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.; CDT General developers
> list.; Target Management developer discussions
> Cc: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE
> "RemoteCDTLaunch"feature into CDT
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure this is a beginner question but...
>
> If the CDT will have a dependency on TM (RSE) for one of its
> launches, what will happen to user that don't install RSE?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marc
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Schaefer, Doug
> Sent: Wed 3/4/2009 4:32 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.; Target Management developer
> discussions
> Cc: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE
> "Remote CDTLaunch"feature into CDT
>
> I don't think it's that big of deal. Not sure why TM is +2.
> Ideally, we should be able to build all of this at the same time.
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:22 PM
> To: Target Management developer discussions
> Cc: Target Management developer discussions; CDT
> General developers list.; dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE
> "Remote CDT Launch"feature into CDT
>
>
>
> Hmm.... Yeah... then CDT would have to go from a +1
> Galileo project to a +3? Unless TM decided to move up to +1?
>
> Sounds messy, at least for right now.
>
> ===========================
> Chris Recoskie
> Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
> IBM Toronto
> Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
> Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> 03/04/2009 04:05 PM
>
> Please respond to
> Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> To
>
> Target Management developer discussions
> <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT
> General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> cc
>
>
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote CDT Launch" feature into CDT
>
>
> I like the idea of having the RSE-based remote launch
> in CDT, but it would introduce a dependency from CDT on the
> Target Management project, which would have implications on
> the CDT build.
> -Pawel
>
> Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you may know, one part of
> the TM / RSE offering is a "Remote CDT" Launch configuration,
> which allows
>
> * Uploading files through
> RSE-provided Services
> * Launching the program remotely
> through an RSE-provided shell
> * Debugging remotely through a
> remote gdbserver instance (requires local cross-gdb).
>
> The implementation of this feature
> requires using CDT internal non-API [1]
> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402> in
> order to get the debugger configuration page into the launch
> config UI, which is forbidden in Galileo.
>
> We'd therefore think it makes sense to
> move the feature into the CDT [2]
> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065> -- on
> the RSE side, only public API is being used. In other words,
> we propose adding a new optional CDT feature "Remote Launch"
> which depends on the RSE, and removing that feature from the
> RSE offering.
>
> The feature itself doesn't expose any
> API (everything is "internal"), so renaming the plugin and/or
> the package should not be an issue if that is desired.
>
> Does the CDT Community agree that this
> is a good thing to do?
> Who is the right person to get in touch
> with for making it happen?
> Is it realistic to get that done for M6?
>
> [1]
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402
> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402>
> [2]
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065
> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of
> Technical Staff, Wind River
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> <http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
> <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
>
>
>
>
>