RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote CDT Launch"featur

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think it's that big of deal. Not sure why TM is +2. Ideally, we
should be able to build all of this at the same time.
 
Doug.
 


________________________________

	From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Recoskie
	Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:22 PM
	To: Target Management developer discussions
	Cc: Target Management developer discussions; CDT General
developers list.; dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
	Subject: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote CDT
Launch"feature into CDT
	
	

	Hmm.... Yeah... then CDT would have to go from a +1 Galileo
project to a +3? Unless TM decided to move up to +1?
	
	Sounds messy, at least for right now.
	
	===========================
	Chris Recoskie
	Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
	IBM Toronto
	 Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	
	
	

				Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
				Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx


				03/04/2009 04:05 PM 
	
	Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 

To

Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT
General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>	


cc

	


Subject

Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote CDT Launch" feature into CDT	
	 	

	I like the idea of having the RSE-based remote launch in CDT,
but it would introduce a dependency from CDT on the Target Management
project, which would have implications on the CDT build.
	-Pawel
	
	Oberhuber, Martin wrote: 

			Hi all,
			
			As some of you may know, one part of the TM /
RSE offering is a "Remote CDT" Launch configuration, which allows 

				*	Uploading files through
RSE-provided Services 
				*	Launching the program remotely
through an RSE-provided shell 
				*	Debugging remotely through a
remote gdbserver instance (requires local cross-gdb).

			The implementation of this feature requires
using CDT internal non-API [1]
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402>  in order to get
the debugger configuration page into the launch config UI, which is
forbidden in Galileo.
			
			We'd therefore think it makes sense to move the
feature into the CDT [2]
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065>  -- on the RSE
side, only public API is being used. In other words, we propose adding a
new optional CDT feature "Remote Launch" which depends on the RSE, and
removing that feature from the RSE offering.
			
			The feature itself doesn't expose any API
(everything is "internal"), so renaming the plugin and/or the package
should not be an issue if that is desired.
			
			Does the CDT Community agree that this is a good
thing to do?
			Who is the right person to get in touch with for
making it happen?
			Is it realistic to get that done for M6?
			
			[1] 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402> 
			[2] 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065> 
			
			Thanks,
			--
			Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
			Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
			http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
<http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm> 
			
			
			
			
________________________________

			
			_______________________________________________
			dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
			dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
			
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev> 
			 

	_______________________________________________
	dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
	dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
	https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev