|RE: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote CDT Launch"feature into CDT|
We are +2, because we depend on CDT right now. On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:32 -0800, Schaefer, Doug wrote: > I don't think it's that big of deal. Not sure why TM is +2. Ideally, > we should be able to build all of this at the same time. > > Doug. > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris > Recoskie > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:22 PM > To: Target Management developer discussions > Cc: Target Management developer discussions; CDT General > developers list.; dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [cdt-dev] Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Moving the RSE "Remote > CDT Launch"feature into CDT > > > > Hmm.... Yeah... then CDT would have to go from a +1 Galileo > project to a +3? Unless TM decided to move up to +1? > > Sounds messy, at least for right now. > > =========================== > Chris Recoskie > Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT > IBM Toronto > Inactive hide details for Pawel Piech > <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Pawel Piech > <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > > 03/04/2009 04:05 PM > Please respond to > Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To > > Target > Management > developer > discussions > <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > cc > > > > Subject > > Re: > [dsdp-tm-dev] > Moving the RSE > "Remote CDT > Launch" feature > into CDT > > > > I like the idea of having the RSE-based remote launch in CDT, > but it would introduce a dependency from CDT on the Target > Management project, which would have implications on the CDT > build. > -Pawel > > Oberhuber, Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > > As some of you may know, one part of the TM / > RSE offering is a "Remote CDT" Launch > configuration, which allows > * Uploading files through > RSE-provided Services > * Launching the program remotely > through an RSE-provided shell > * Debugging remotely through a > remote gdbserver instance > (requires local cross-gdb). > The implementation of this feature requires > using CDT internal non-API  in order to get > the debugger configuration page into the > launch config UI, which is forbidden in > Galileo. > > We'd therefore think it makes sense to move > the feature into the CDT  -- on the RSE > side, only public API is being used. In other > words, we propose adding a new optional CDT > feature "Remote Launch" which depends on the > RSE, and removing that feature from the RSE > offering. > > The feature itself doesn't expose any API > (everything is "internal"), so renaming the > plugin and/or the package should not be an > issue if that is desired. > > Does the CDT Community agree that this is a > good thing to do? > Who is the right person to get in touch with > for making it happen? > Is it realistic to get that done for M6? > >  > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257402 >  > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=267065 > > Thanks, > -- > Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical > Staff, Wind River > Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC > Member > http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > dsdp-tm-dev mailing list > dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > dsdp-tm-dev mailing list > dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cdt-dev mailing list > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev -- Dr. Anna Dushistova, MontaVista Software Inc.
Back to the top