Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0 M5
Title: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0 M5
I've added a comment to the bug. I did this a long time ago and forget some of the details. Essentially, don't break MinGW launching, i.e. if you are using the MinGW toolchain and click the shortcut, the Lauch config should be set to the MinGW debugger.
 
Doug.

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ken.ryall@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:35 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0 M5

Doug,

I still have one more bug on my list for 5.0.2 but it needs some feedback from you:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=246201

Thanks - Ken

From: "ext Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:10:18 +0100
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0 M5

Wascana seems good too. The debug remains horrible due to the incompatability between MinGW gdb 6.8 and the CDT. It really needs pending breakpoint support. But everything else worked.

I'm good for CDT 5.0.2.

Doug.

 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer,  Doug
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:38 PM
To: CDT  General developers list.
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and  6.0 M5

 
 
I had a great experience with CDT 5.0.2 RC1 on Linux x86_64  (although I can really use a pkg-config import to setup cluttermm's 12 or so  include paths :( ).

 
 
I'll try Wascana as well.

 
 
Doug.

 

 
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris  Recoskie
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:51 PM
To:  CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1  and 6.0 M5

 
 

I updated the bug (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252966)  with some comments. Right now I'm not committing this until that issue is  resolved.

As far as I know this should not be a blocking issue, but  if anyone thinks it should be, please speak  up.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM  CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Chris  Recoskie/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA


   
  

   
 

To


"CDT General developers list."  <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 

cc


 
 

Subject


Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0  M5   
 
I'm looking at the patch right now...

I don't think James'  commit rights have been fully instated  yet.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM  CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Vivian  Kong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA

  
  

  

 Please respond to
"CDT General developers  list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

   

 To


"CDT General developers list."  <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 cc

 Subject


Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0  M5   
 
Hi James,

Are you planning to commit this to HEAD today?  If so, let me know and I'll run another build today for M5, if no one  objects.

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada  Toronto Lab

James Blackburn ---02/03/2009 11:10:17 AM---Hi Vivian,    
 
From:
James Blackburn  <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx>
 
To:
"CDT General developers list."  <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 
Date:
02/03/2009 11:10 AM
 
Subject:
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0  M5




Hi Vivian,

For API  compatibility we should probably have the patch on Bug  252966
committed... It's not a blocker for me, but others who rely  on
ICDescriptor.getProjectData() may not be so  happy.

Cheers,

James

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:36 PM,  Vivian Kong <vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi  everyone,
>
> CDT 5.0.2 RC1 and 6.0 M5 is today. Both of the  builds passed my small sanity
> tests. Has anyone else had a chance to  try these builds out? Once I get more
> confirmation I'll go ahead and  upload the bits to Ganymede and Galileo.
>
> Thank  you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vivian Kong
> IBM  Eclipse CDT
> IBM Canada Toronto Lab
>
>  _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing  list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev  mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev  mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev  mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top