[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] Scanner Info discovery for make projects
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Chapiro
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:41 PM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Scanner Info discovery for make projects
>
> On 20/01/2009 12:02 AM, Alex Chapiro wrote:
> > I'm tring to fix some problems in scanner context discovery
> > implementation. I need it to customize CDT regular make
> project to our
> > tool chain (GNU clone). Unfortunately documentation I found is
> > definitely out of date (CDT 3),. That's why I cannot
> understand real
> > developer's intention in some cases. One of the issues is a
> discovery
> > profile. Specification describes two types of discovery:
> per project
> > and per file. Technically each tool chain could have both
> > implementations, or just any one of two. If both implemented, user
> > should be able to select any of them. Is it right? If yes,
> I don't see
> > a natural way how to do it.There is only one attribute in
> inputType
> > element that connects particular tool to the particular scanner
> > profile. Another option of interpretation is that developers didn't
> > intend to let integrator to have both profiles for one tool
> > simultaneously . May be? The second subject of my concern is the
> > possibility to select any of all defined profiles for any project
> > using combo box on the discovery options page (see field
> "Discovery
> > profile".). Is it a bug ? When I look at this feature
> implementation,
> > it seems to be done on purpose., so I feel myself to be confused.
> > I don't say here about style of implementation (like private
> > constants in code) which is the cause of troubles in customization
> > process, because these are annoying but mainly solvable problems.
> > More interesting to understand what is a correct behavior
> in this case.
> > I'd appreciate clarification of the issue or just opinion how it
> > should work, or reference to more fresh document.;;Thanks,
> >
> > Alex.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> I found more recent documentation in Bugzilla report
> 115935. I think that it would be much more convenient if
> design documentation and specs would be concentrated in one place.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
Alex,
Also take a look at the "What's new in CDT Build System 4.0" entry in
the "CDT Plug-in Developer Plug-in Guide" in Help->Help Contents.
There are still at least a couple things missing from that: see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=245685 .
Steve Kennedy
