Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] CDT-Windows (MSVC)

This is all still under development, so some are bugs and some are things
that aren't done yet.

- nullVC - which version of MSVC are you using? Currently I only have
support for the new Windows SDK, which has the latest 2005 version. Please
raise a bug on this one. I will probably need the registry keys that point
to the MSVC install if it's something I don't have access to.

- We never had a mingw target. The GNU on Windows target was really cygwin,
as evidenced by adding cygwin/bin to the path. I have a new MinGW target in
the separate mingw feature in the works. I will also likely factor out the
cygwin target into it's own feature and then have multiple CDT features for
Windows. I think...

- Thanks for the compliments on 4.0. The team has been working hard to clean
up bugs and solidify the features.

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of kesselhaus@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:13 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT-Windows (MSVC)
> Hi,
> I'm using the 4.0 branch builds, and wanted to try/test the MSVC plugin.
> * Where do I adapt the paths in the MSVC projects?
>   Every path (macro/environment) starts with "nullVC"
>    e.g. INCLUDE =
> "nullVC\Include;nullVC\Include\Sys;nullInclude;nullInclude\gl;D:\Win16App\
> Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\SDK\v1.1\include\"
> * Also, where did the MinGW target go? Can't select this anymore. There is
> now only cygwin and Windows (using MSVC). Or is the MSVC plugin
> overwriting the MinGW, because I think the MinGW targets were also called
> Windows?
> Are these bugs and if yes, are these already reported?
> BTW., I must admit that CDT4.0 looks like a lot of improvement work. I'm
> really impressed, e.g. by the PDOM, content assist and syntax
> highlighting.
> Is there a way to set the color of the vertical bar (where you can un-
> /fold code)? Though, if I want to have a dark editor scheme, this bar is a
> little annoying in color.
> I'm still thinking about something like:
>  * add unit test support extension
>  * code coverage support using gcc/gcov
> Regards,
> Henning
> --
> "Feel free" - 5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS/Monat ...
> Jetzt GMX ProMail testen:
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top