[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-dev] New components proposal
|
Sounds good to me. Do we have a strategy/policy on what would be allowed to
be written in C/C++ versus pure Java. I don't mean to start a language war
but given the complexity of C++ especially, it may be necessary to optimize
the performance of certain components to deal with that complexity.
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Marineau [mailto:sebastien@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:18 PM
To: 'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [cdt-dev] New components proposal
Hi all,
Unless someone objects, we're going to have the following components
added to the CDT:
org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.ui
-> Plugin to have gdb/mi specific UI features (e.g. a gdb console)
-> Initial commiter list will be the same as org.eclipse.cdt.debug.mi.core
org.eclipse.cdt.core.win32
org.eclipse.cdt.core.solaris
org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux
org.eclipse.cdt.core.qnx
-> These are fragments to org.eclipse.cdt.core and will add
host platform specific code and shared libraries. The first use
for them is to add in our "spawner" libraries that manage the
spawning of external programs from eclipse (with some added
functionality over the Runtime.Exec in Java -- most notably
no command.com windows on win32).
-> Original commiter list will be the same as org.eclipse.cdt.core
Sebastien
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
