Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)


> From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail Khodjaiants
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:49 AM
> To: CDT Debug developers list
> Subject: RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)
> 
> > According to an email from Matthias, there was no legal barrier to
> this patch, see:
> 
> As far as I know, even if there are no legal barriers from his company,
> the Eclipse Foundation still have to check the code. The committer who
> appllies the patch should fill a special form and send the patch to the
> Eclipse Foundation. The patch can only be applied after it's been
> approved by them. That's my understanding, by I am not an expert. Ask
> Dave I. or Doug.
> 
> > There is an item to use the logical structure and the detail pane to
> deal with this.  Are we overlapping?
> 
> As far as I remember, the patch extends the existing CDI types by adding
> a new generic type. My suggestion is to add a mechanism (extension
> point) to do it instead of extending the CDI.
> Logical structures and detail panels are used to provide special
> presentations of the existing types.
> 

The problem is not legal but rather we want to provide that functionality
differently,  I'm updating the PR.




Back to the top