[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)
|
> According to an email from Matthias, there was no legal barrier to
this patch, see:
As far as I know, even if there are no legal barriers from his company,
the Eclipse Foundation still have to check the code. The committer who
appllies the patch should fill a special form and send the patch to the
Eclipse Foundation. The patch can only be applied after it's been
approved by them. That's my understanding, by I am not an expert. Ask
Dave I. or Doug.
> There is an item to use the logical structure and the detail pane to
deal with this. Are we overlapping?
As far as I remember, the patch extends the existing CDI types by adding
a new generic type. My suggestion is to add a mechanism (extension
point) to do it instead of extending the CDI.
Logical structures and detail panels are used to provide special
presentations of the existing types.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alain Magloire
Sent: 03 November 2006 16:16
To: CDT Debug developers list
Cc: matthias@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)
> From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail Khodjaiants
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 11:12 AM
> To: CDT Debug developers list
> Subject: RE: [cdt-debug-dev] CDI proposals (on the wiki)
>
> There are two reasons why I didn't apply (a):
> - the main reason: it's two big to apply it without going through the
> legal procedure, i.e. fill the questionnaire, submit it to the Eclipse
> legal department and wait for permission.
According to an email from Matthias, there was no legal barrier to this
patch, see:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-debug-dev/msg01560.html
I've updated the PR with your comments
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=126092
Maybe we can resolve this.
> - I was thinking to add an extension point to allow clients to
> contribute custom types instead of extending the CDI. It would be
> great if we implement all C/C++ specific types as contributions and
> make the base of CDI language independent. I think it's doable
>
Hmm ..
There is an item to use the logical structure and the detail pane to
deal with this. Are we overlapping?
> (b) my proposal doesn't cover all changes. See for example the
> following
> bugs:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=122013
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=84934
> These are minor changes.
>
Ok, If we can do this for 4.0 we should move the milestone.
But #84934 needs a change to CDI also
> But we should also consider to use the source lookup capabilities and
> access to the symbol information provided by the backend.
>
You mention this a few times last year, but I've been so disconnected
from CDT/Debug that my mind is blank, send me an email to refresh my
memories.
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
