[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-debug-dev] RE: Elf naming change
|
+1 Sounds fine to me as well
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT Team
IBM Toronto
http://www.eclipse.org/cdt
Alain Magloire
<alain@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: To
cdt-debug-dev-bou CDT Debug developers list
nces@xxxxxxxxxxx <cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
20/10/2006 10:33 Subject
AM [cdt-debug-dev] RE: Elf naming
change
Please respond to
CDT Debug
developers list
<cdt-debug-dev@ec
lipse.org>
From John Cortell
> From:
> Sent: None
> Subject:
>
> I'd like to change how CDT displays the type of elf binary. Right now, it
> takes the processor name and appends a "be" or "le" to indicate
endiannes.
> While this scheme may work OK for "arm", once you have a longer name,
with
> uppercase characters even, the end result isn't very good (see screenshot
> below).
>
> My proposal is to:
>
> - allow endiannes to be omitted where it does not vary; i.e., not all
> processors support multiple endianness. Whether it does or not will be
> another attribute harcoded in Elf.java
> - where endianness does apply, form the name as follows "cpuname/BE|LE".
> So, for example:
>
> "arm/LE"
> "arm/BE"
>
> Any objections?
>
Niet/No
+1
But how about "arm/le", "arm/be"?
You may also want to said email cdt-dev-core about this, since it affects
more then the debugger.
> John
>
>
> Emacs!
>
??
Vi!
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
