[cdt-debug-dev] RE: Elf naming change

[Alain Magloire <alain@xxxxxxx>]

 From John Cortell
> From:
> Sent: None
> Subject:
> 
> I'd like to change how CDT displays the type of elf binary. Right now, it
> takes the processor name and appends a "be" or "le" to indicate endiannes.
> While this scheme may work OK for "arm", once you have a longer name, with
> uppercase characters even, the end result isn't very good (see screenshot
> below).
> 
> My proposal is to:
> 
> - allow endiannes to be omitted where it does not vary; i.e., not all
> processors support multiple endianness. Whether it does or not will be
> another attribute harcoded in Elf.java
> - where endianness does apply, form the name as follows "cpuname/BE|LE".
> So, for example:
> 
>          "arm/LE"
>          "arm/BE"
> 
> Any objections?
> 

Niet/No

+1

But how about "arm/le", "arm/be"?
You may also want to said email cdt-dev-core about this, since it affects
more then the debugger.


> John
> 
> 
> Emacs!
>

??

Vi!