[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] List of Plan items
|
John,
I don't think anyone is planning to break compatibilty. All
API changes and extensions should be discussed and approved by the
community.
Mikhail
I wanted to re-post this question, as I didn't get any feedback. A
decision one way or another on this matter will have a significant impact in how
we approach changes we make for CDT 4.0.
John
At 07:22 AM
10/17/2006, John Cortell wrote:
At 12:58 PM 10/16/2006, Alain
Magloire wrote:
I do not see any difficulty
except that it will break backward compatibility
but since this is
targeting a major release, it should not be a problem.
Hm. I'd
like to stop for a second and discuss this point. Is it true that we should be
OK with breaking CDI compatibility in 4.0? We're working on various features
(which we will contribute for 4.0) where we go out of the way to not
break compatibility, by, e.g., introducing an ICDIThread2. If we're looking at
breaking compatibility anyway, then there's no point in use going this messier
route.
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
