RE: [cdt-debug-dev] List of Plan items

[John Cortell <john.cortell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I wanted to re-post this question, as I didn't get any feedback. A
decision one way or another on this matter will have a significant impact
in how we approach changes we make for CDT 4.0.

John

At 07:22 AM 10/17/2006, John Cortell wrote:
> At 12:58 PM 10/16/2006, Alain
> Magloire wrote:
> > I do not see any difficulty
> > except that it will break backward compatibility
> > but since this is targeting a major release, it should not be a
> > problem.
>
> Hm. I'd like to stop for a second and discuss this point. Is it true that
> we should be OK with breaking CDI compatibility in 4.0? We're working on
> various features (which we will contribute for 4.0) where we go out of
> the way to not break compatibility, by, e.g., introducing an
> ICDIThread2. If we're looking at breaking compatibility anyway, then
> there's no point in use going this messier route.