[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] The fate of the current GDB support in CDT
|
Definitely. One of the things I'm working on is figuring out a standard way
to do JTAG via GDB. Certainly Oyvind's work there is a great example of how
to do it. Look for this in CDT 4.0 for next year.
Doug Schaefer
QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hugh O'Keeffe
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 6:19 AM
To: 'CDT Debug developers list'
Subject: RE: [cdt-debug-dev] The fate of the current GDB support in CDT
Hi All,
I work in an embedded tools company and we have many GDB users who use the
Eclipse CDT environment with Oyvind's additions/patches. I would love to see
CDT "fixed" to allow out-of-box support for embedded/remote GDB users and
for what it's worth wholeheartedly support Oyvind's suggestion.
Having great embedded/remote GDB support in Eclipse CDT will increase the
user base, particularly, amongst folks using embedded linux.
Regards,
Hugh O'Keeffe,
Ashling Microsystems Ltd.,
http://www.ashling.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Øyvind Harboe
> Sent: 01 September 2006 09:20
> To: cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-debug-dev] The fate of the current GDB support in CDT
>
> How about splitting GDB support into a seperate plugin from CDT since
> it will probably be superseeded by the Windriver stuff?
>
> There is a need to continue to improve the GDB support while waiting
> for the Windriver(year/s?) to get done.
>
> There are lots of users of the current GDB stuff that are either
> happy or only need minimal changes. Splitting it into a seperate
> plugin with a seperate release cycle to CDT would help get fixes
> applied.
>
> This would also remove the current GDB support from the next CDT
> release, which should hopefully, mean more free resources to work on
> the Windriver stuff.
>
> Any other bright ideas to get GDB support in CDT unstuck
> would be most welcome.
>
> --
> Øyvind Harboe
> http://www.zylin.com
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-debug-dev mailing list
> cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
