Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cbi-dev] GitHub pull-requests and Hudson

On 09/11/2014 01:58 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
One of the nice things about Hudson is that it is stable.  Perhaps it is stable because it doesn't run buggy plugins?  I don't know.  In my opinion, supporting buggy applications is a non-starter.
Jenkins by itself is pretty stable. But it's true that (just like Eclipse or any pluggable application in general), the quality of the available plugins is variable.

With that being said, I agree validating PRs from GitHub would be beneficial. Perhaps instead of a Hudson plugin we could consider a GitHub hook, which could invoke some process on Hudson.  Maybe we can be wild and crazy, and have Gerrit mirror Github and leverage the Gerrit tooling.  Who knows.
IMO, the simplest thing from usage POV would be a Hudson plugin.
But indeed, we could think of a hook on GitHub that would use Hudson API to start a job (giving PR # and commitId as parameters) on Hudson.
It would perhaps be a good idea to file a bug against CBI so that we can investigate alternatives.  Please don't assume that this will happen soon, though, as our resources for doing such work are severely constrained.
I opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=443818
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

Back to the top