Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [birt-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] FW: TrackAllocations

Scott,
 
I'm OK with the allocation. Although as one of the more active projects in the community, I wonder if we need more short talks.
 
I think we have enough talks from a project perspective -- i.e. talks that the committers will propose and deliver. But if we get proposals from the broader community we may find it to be a challenge.
 
Having said that, I note that there is a reserve for "for later allocations and said that quality of recruited content will open up the extra slots". So, if we get demand / are able to recruit additional community driven talks, then we can petition for those slots I guess.
 
Net: Yes, I'm OK with the allocation.
 
Paul.


From: birt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:birt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Rosenbaum
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 12:47 PM
To: 'BIRT PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,and Group discussions)'
Subject: [birt-pmc] FW: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] FW: TrackAllocations

All,

 

I just received the EclipseCon Track allocations.  Please see below.  My opinion is that we have a little less than last year but we did pretty well.  Does anyone take exception with the number of allocated tracks?  If you do, let me know and I will take it up tomorrow when we meet.


Scott

 


From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] FW: Track Allocations

 

Hi folks,

 

The track allocations have gotten more complicated with our shift to more short talks.  I wanted to explain the allocations prior to tomorrow’s meeting so you’ll be prepared to discuss.

 

Doug

 

 

Assumptions

-          Actuals from last year make it impossible to directly convert to this year.

o        Last year:  71 long talks, 16 panels, 34 demos, 100 short talks, 87 2hr tutorial

o        This year:  80 long talks, 160 short talks, 80 2hr tutorial

o        We have a new track (Committer & Contributor) that also needs talks

-          Short talks are a good format for many things that we may be tempted to put in a long talk.

-          Short talks that are grouped can be used in a variety of creative ways

o        4 talks and a 10-minute Q&A or Panel

o        5 speakers on the same theme (time limits and delineation will be enforced)

o        Speedy demos

-          50-minute panel talks are of moderate value and should be chosen carefully (read: do less panels).

-          Most demos should be quick overviews to introduce technology.

-          Lengthy demos that are user focused should be tutorials.

-          Bjorn instructed me to reserve some talks for later allocations and said that quality of recruited content will open up these extra slots.

 

Color code (to make mental comparisons easier):

 

Vertical

Top-level Project

Eclipse Platform

Misc

 

Track allocation:

 

Track

Long

Short

Tutorial

Business

5

5

0

C/C++

2

5

3

Data Tooling

3

5

3

Director's Choice

2

0

0

Emerging Technology

5

20

3

Industry

2

10

0

Java

4

5

3

Mobile/Embedded

4

10

3

Modeling

5

10

8

Committer and Contributor

4

5

3

OSGi

4

10

6

Other

2

5

1

Platform

4

10

9

RCP

4

10

9

Reporting

4

5

3

SOA

4

5

3

Test & Performance

4

10

6

Tools

4

10

3

Web & AJAX

5

10

9

Totals

71

150

75

Slots

80

160

80

 


Back to the top