| Hi Ansgar and LVL Team,
we just recognized that the PMC didn’t get your email. Please make sure, that your are subscribed to the mailing list.
Could you please provide also some merits for Maite? For Brian we found some.
Thanks!
Best, Andy
Hey Andy and PMC, let me chime in here since we have a kind of different situation in this project and your requests are more than valid. Since the Eclipse SDV LVL project is not really working on code artifacts but on a taxonomy for maturity levels of an digital vehicle the work which the different involved parties are doing is happening on spreadsheets and/or PPT. the main artifact the round of experts is working on is: The project working folder (so to say their gitlab repo is) To fulfill the needs of transparency and also proving about an earned merit the EF asked the project to file detailed meeting minutes which collects all this information. Those could be found here: where you could also see how intense Maite and Brian contributed to the current version of the maturity framework. This overall working style is an experiment also for the EF but we would like to support this experiment of open source work on non code artifacts. Hope that clarifies your questions. Happy to dig deeper! Best Ansgar Dear Andy, dear all, Thank you for raising this. I’m looping in my colleague Ansgar (in CC), who can help follow up on the questions about the committer elections for Maite and Brian on Eclipse SDV-LVL. Best regards, Ana FYI, as I was not subscribed in the LVL mailing list
Dear Martin, Dear Maite, Dear Brian, I am writing in behalf of the Automotive PMC. We would like to understand, which significant impact and which new content were introduced and structured, as we cannot see any track record on the repo. Is there anything we can have a look on? Are there any public discussions or documents we can see? Thank you so much for your response! in behalf of the Automotive PMC
|
