|
|
| Re: Eclipse Runtime Analysis Tools [message #646252 is a reply to message #645543] |
Wed, 22 December 2010 21:53   |
 David Williams
Messages: 176
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
> The Eclipse Runtime Analysis Tools project proposal has now been posted.
> You can find it at http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/tools.rat/
>
Nice proposal and nice contribution to Eclipse.
What namespace do you plan to use? "org.eclipse.rat"? (I'm mostly
curious about the "org.eclipse..." part ... since this code has existed
outside of Eclipse).
You don't mention or compare other Eclipse projects. I think it would
improve the proposal a little, if you did, For example, MAT?
http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
And, of course, TPTP ... http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/ ... even though it
has said it plans to go through an archival proposal, it would be
interesting to know how RAT compares to it ... just some brief
"education" or "expectation setting" to the Eclipse community, since
some might be familiar with or current users of TPTP or MAT, so some
short (and easy) comparisons would be nice (or, opportunities for
synergy?). (I mention "easy" explicitly since I know a detailed
comparison or study could take lots of work ... and I wanted to be sure
you knew I was not asking for that for your proposal ... just something
brief and high level ... at least acknowledge these other projects).
I think the project's tools will immediately be useful to many Eclipse
users, and it will be interesting to see if/how others might extend it
to other languages or environments.
Thanks,
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse Runtime Analysis Tools [message #659095 is a reply to message #646252] |
Thu, 10 March 2011 23:34 |
Pavel Petrochenko
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
>What namespace do you plan to use? "org.eclipse.rat"? (I'm >mostly
>curious about the "org.eclipse..." part ... since this code has >existed
>outside of Eclipse).
yes, we are planning to use org.eclipse.rat name space.
>You don't mention or compare other Eclipse projects. I think it >would
>improve the proposal a little, if you did, For example, MAT?
>http://www.eclipse.org/mat/
>And, of course, TPTP ... http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/ ... even >though it
>has said it plans to go through an archival proposal, it would >be
>interesting to know how RAT compares to it ... just some brief
>"education" or "expectation setting" to the Eclipse community, >since
>some might be familiar with or current users of TPTP or MAT, >so some
>short (and easy) comparisons would be nice (or, opportunities >for
>synergy?). (I mention "easy" explicitly since I know a detailed
>comparison or study could take lots of work ... and I wanted to >be sure
>you knew I was not asking for that for your proposal ... just >something
>brief and high level ... at least acknowledge these other >projects).
I added few additions covering relationship with MAT/TPTP to proposal(Relationship with Other Eclipse Projects section)
Regards,
Pavel
[Updated on: Thu, 10 March 2011 23:37] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04698 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
Hopefully we can get a great logo for it down the road. 
