no news is good news? [message #4678] |
Fri, 14 March 2008 06:55 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: sdiz.spspam.spam.sdiz.spam.net
Almost no traffic on this newsgroup.
Not even an announcement of new version.
Is this newsgroup dead?
--
This space was intended to be left blank.
|
|
|
|
Re: no news is good news? [message #4884 is a reply to message #4747] |
Fri, 14 March 2008 10:58 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: sdiz.spspam.spam.sdiz.spam.net
Abel Muiño wrote:
> Well, the release is for q4e, which is intended to be the initial source
> contribution for the project. I'll announce releases here too if you're
> interested, but I feel a little like cross-posting.
>
> IAM is, by no means, dead. It just awaiting the community to show its
> support to the initiative (in this forum, by eclipse rules... ).
>
When will q4e code base migrate to eclipse.org?
What are we waiting for? legal review? community input? or what?
--
This space was intended to be left blank.
|
|
|
|
Re: no news is good news? [message #5155 is a reply to message #5019] |
Fri, 14 March 2008 17:10 |
Carlos Sanchez Messages: 40 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
The tircky part is to find the mentors, so if you know somebody in the
Architecture Council
http://www.eclipse.org/org/foundation/council.php
just bug them until they agree to mentor the project ;)
I plan to do it too next week at EclipseCON
Abel Muiño wrote:
> We are in the proposal phase... no code can be contributed until we move
> to the incubation phase.
>
> The objective of this phase is:
> The proposers, in conjunction with the destination PMC and the
> community, collaborate in public to enhance, refine, and clarify the
> proposal. Mentors for the project must be identified during this phase.
>
> ( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/proposal-phase.p hp).
>
> So we are essentially gathering a community around q4e in several ways
> (for example, Carlos will be talking about it at Eclipse Con) while
> searching for mentors.
>
> What can you do to help?
> Tell your friends about q4e. If you use q4e/iam, report back how useful
> it is, what objectives it should not address and what objectives which
> are missing from the proposal should be considered.
>
> Essentially... show you're there. Show if the proposal makes sense
> (note, we're not actually talking about implementations at this point).
> Show if there is a need for this kind of project in the Eclipse Foundation.
>
> Moving into the incubation phase is essentially a matter of
> demonstrating that there is enough interest from the Eclipse community
> in the project.
>
|
|
|
|
Re: no news is good news? [message #565028 is a reply to message #4747] |
Fri, 14 March 2008 10:58 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: sdiz.spspam.spam.sdiz.spam.net
Abel Muiño wrote:
> Well, the release is for q4e, which is intended to be the initial source
> contribution for the project. I'll announce releases here too if you're
> interested, but I feel a little like cross-posting.
>
> IAM is, by no means, dead. It just awaiting the community to show its
> support to the initiative (in this forum, by eclipse rules... ).
>
When will q4e code base migrate to eclipse.org?
What are we waiting for? legal review? community input? or what?
--
This space was intended to be left blank.
|
|
|
|
Re: no news is good news? [message #565152 is a reply to message #5019] |
Fri, 14 March 2008 17:10 |
Carlos Sanchez Messages: 40 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
The tircky part is to find the mentors, so if you know somebody in the
Architecture Council
http://www.eclipse.org/org/foundation/council.php
just bug them until they agree to mentor the project ;)
I plan to do it too next week at EclipseCON
Abel Muiño wrote:
> We are in the proposal phase... no code can be contributed until we move
> to the incubation phase.
>
> The objective of this phase is:
> The proposers, in conjunction with the destination PMC and the
> community, collaborate in public to enhance, refine, and clarify the
> proposal. Mentors for the project must be identified during this phase.
>
> ( http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/proposal-phase.p hp).
>
> So we are essentially gathering a community around q4e in several ways
> (for example, Carlos will be talking about it at Eclipse Con) while
> searching for mentors.
>
> What can you do to help?
> Tell your friends about q4e. If you use q4e/iam, report back how useful
> it is, what objectives it should not address and what objectives which
> are missing from the proposal should be considered.
>
> Essentially... show you're there. Show if the proposal makes sense
> (note, we're not actually talking about implementations at this point).
> Show if there is a need for this kind of project in the Eclipse Foundation.
>
> Moving into the incubation phase is essentially a matter of
> demonstrating that there is enough interest from the Eclipse community
> in the project.
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03699 seconds