Re: [wtp-pmc] FW: [Bug 108313] Eclipse SDK should have a UI Architect

[Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Tim,

It might be better if the members created
a UI committee just like the Architecture, Requirements, and Planning committees.
The committee would be charged with ensuring the overall UI consistency
of the platform. It would be staffed by member companies. There would not
be a dedicated Eclipse Foundation employee.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

"Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

08/30/2005 11:19 AM

Please respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,  and Group discussions)"

To	"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,  and Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[wtp-pmc] FW: [Bug 108313] Eclipse SDK should have a UI Architect

I think this sounds like a good idea, but I'd also
like to hear other
opinions from WTP PMC members.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Milinkovich [mailto:mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 11:31 PM
To: Bjorn Freeman-Benson; Doug Gaff; John Duimovich; John Graham; John
Wiegand; Tim Wagner; Tyler Thessin; Wenfeng Li
Subject: FW: [Bug 108313] Eclipse SDK should have a UI Architect




https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=108313

I would like to hear your opinions on whether this is a good idea. My
inclination is "yes". But it would have to be clearly seen as
a value
add to
the projects, or the exercise would certainly fail. 


Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director,
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Office: 613-224-9461 x228
Cell: 613-220-3223
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
 


_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc