[wakaama-dev] COAP over TCP/TLS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[wakaama-dev] COAP over TCP/TLS

From: Bert Kleewein <bertk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 04:49:43 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Delivered-to: wakaama-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/wakaama-dev>
List-help: <mailto:wakaama-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wakaama-dev>, <mailto:wakaama-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/wakaama-dev>, <mailto:wakaama-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AdGqdmvQEdwbC7TQQ7iVj4CvBEjqcg==
Thread-topic: COAP over TCP/TLS

Hi All,

We are currently working to modify Wakaama/Erbium to support COAP over TCP/TLS (following https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-01, but I assume we will upgrade to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-02)

Our internal proof-of-concept currently chooses between UDP and TCP via compile-time switch (#define). This was chosen as the path of least resistance, and it has both advantages and disadvantages.

My question is this: What is the community preference for switching between TCP and UDP? Would a run-time switch (via the lwm2m_binding_t enum) or a build-time switch (via #define) be preferred?

Thanks,

-Bert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wakaama-dev] COAP over TCP/TLS
  - From: Kraus Achim (INST/ESY1)
- Re: [wakaama-dev] COAP over TCP/TLS
  - From: Bill Silverajan

Prev by Date: [wakaama-dev] LWM2M in RIOT-OS with Eclipse Wakaama
Next by Date: Re: [wakaama-dev] COAP over TCP/TLS
Previous by thread: [wakaama-dev] LWM2M in RIOT-OS with Eclipse Wakaama
Next by thread: Re: [wakaama-dev] COAP over TCP/TLS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs