Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [udig-users] catalog doesn't persist

Hi Rahul; can you please keep this conversation to the developer or user list?

I have been able to confirm the problem (by using a directory with a
space in the name); but I work during the week and will be unable to
do anything for you until the weekend. If you keep the conversation on
the developer list another community member may be able to help?

Jody

2009/4/14 Rahul... हम पंछी उन्मुक्त गगन के <rahul.official@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Jody,
> Name of the layer is also not getting displayed in the catalog view. Again,
> at some places it happens for the UDIG-SDK, and at some places it works from
> the custom-App. I have attached the snapshot for ur consideration.
>
> 2009/4/13 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Heh; I believe you my friend. However the fun part is not believing
>> you but looking for the details that lead the program astray.
>>
>> I am going to try and create my own "d a t a" directory now I guess.
>>
>> Jody
>>
>> 2009/4/13 Rahul... हम पंछी उन्मुक्त गगन के <rahul.official@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Thanks for the effort. Jody, I would like to let u know that E:/Rahul/d
>> > a t
>> > a/uDigSampleData/bc_border.shp is a valid path. and the
>> > bc_border.shp layer
>> > gets added for the first time as I said earlier. But it does not persist
>> > when I restart the Udig. I am attaching one more screenshot as a
>> > proof...
>> > ;-)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/4/13 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for sending the log - one thing I noticed was this:
>> >> - org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.2 being loaded.
>> >>
>> >> We have not tried Eclipse 3.4.2 yet (since I have not had time); I
>> >> will try upgrading and see if it makes a difference.
>> >>
>> >> The log lines here looked interesting:
>> >>
>> >> file:/E:/Rahul/d a t a/uDigSampleData/bc_border.shp#bc_border
>> >>
>> >> In particular have you made a folder called "d a t a" or is that a
>> >> problem we need to look into?
>> >>
>> >> Jody
>> >>
>> >> 2009/4/13 Rahul... हम पंछी उन्मुक्त गगन के <rahul.official@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> > Hi Jody, I have attached the log file that I got on the console after
>> >> > tracing following plugins:
>> >> > catalog.shp
>> >> > udig.project
>> >> > udig.project.ui
>> >> > render.feature.shapefile
>> >> >
>> >> > 2009/4/10 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Rahul - I am also puzzled; so back to the plan of turning on some
>> >> >> logging so we can see where things go wrong.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jody
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2009/4/10 Rahul... हम पंछी उन्मुक्त गगन के
>> >> >> <rahul.official@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> >> > Thats the problem Jody, Nothing is different. ;-( Everything is
>> >> >> > same
>> >> >> > on
>> >> >> > all
>> >> >> > the systems. Even on the same system, how can it happen that the
>> >> >> > SDK
>> >> >> > works
>> >> >> > but the customApp has the problem or the vice versa?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2009/4/10 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > I have already reported the bug. I would also like to tell u
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > problem occurs at all the systems I have tried. At some systems
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > SDK
>> >> >> >> > runs
>> >> >> >> > fine but the problem remains with the customApp and at some
>> >> >> >> > systems
>> >> >> >> > it
>> >> >> >> > is
>> >> >> >> > just the opposite. Then again at some systems the probelm
>> >> >> >> > occurs
>> >> >> >> > in
>> >> >> >> > SDK
>> >> >> >> > as
>> >> >> >> > well as the customApp.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Okay a couple questions; you mentioned that the problem occurs
>> >> >> >> everywhere - I got that. You also reported the system
>> >> >> >> configuration
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> the bug report.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I am trying to ask "what" is different when:
>> >> >> >> - the SDK runs fine but the problem remains with the customApp;
>> >> >> >> - and at some systems it is just the opposite
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So that means that the SDK (running from eclipse) works on some
>> >> >> >> machines; and fails on others. And it also means the customApp
>> >> >> >> runs
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >> some machines and not others.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So I am I am down to wondering if their our spaces in the
>> >> >> >> filename
>> >> >> >> or
>> >> >> >> something else like a language setting that could be messing us
>> >> >> >> up?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Jody
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Rahul
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Rahul
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> > Rahul
>> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Rahul
>


Back to the top