Re: [udig-devel] Custom App Tutorial Export Product Problem

[RK <rk.aranas@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Now using the following setup:

uDig 1.2-RC2

dropins-3.5.2 

eclipse modeling SR2

eclipse 3.5.2 delta pack

jre1.6.0_17.win32_gdal_ecw

Now I'm getting the following error:

Bundle org.eclipse.compare.core.nl_de_3.5.0.v20091121043401 failed to resolve.:
    Host plug-in org.eclipse.compare.core_0.0.0 has not been found.

This is on Windows Vista.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Let me try and explain the error message for a bit ...

udig-1.2-M9-sdk was created against Eclipse 3.5.1 ...

When you tried to make a custom app using Eclipse 3.5.2 if failed .... it was looking for a version of a plugin with 3.5.1 in the version number.- 

Bundle org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86_3.5.1.v3555a failed to resolve.:

So it could not find 3.5.1.v3555a.

Jody

On 30/03/2010, at 12:00 AM, RK wrote:

I don't know. I just downloaded the files on the March 2010 SDK quickstart.

Would you happen to know how to solve the problem btw?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi RK - I am going to upload a new SDK Quickstart shortly and would simply *love* feedback on it :-) In particular I want to make sure all the links and so on work ... 

What you describe did not make too much sense for configuration ... I am expecting:

uDig 1.2-RC2 :-)

dropins-3.5.2  (this is the replacement for "extras")

eclipse modeling SR2 (ie Eclipse 3.5.2)

eclipse 3.5.2 delta pack

jre1.6.0_17.win32_gdal_ecw

To use an older copy of uDig SDK you would need to hunt down the version of eclipse used at that time...

The product export part is the first chance you get to see if your SDK Quickstart was done correctly.

Jody

On 29/03/2010, at 5:00 PM, RK wrote:

Hello,

Just getting started with uDig and I though I mighst. On the website is written, that they implemented against WMS 1.1.0 where this parameters defined as mandatory. I already posted a message on the gwc mailing list to get a confirmation. And at the wiki-page http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/WMS_Tiling_Client_Recommendation is written: 'Each tiling profile needs to establish ... [] width, height, srs.

The request of the udig wmsc client is right now without these parameters. So could anybody confirm, that the wmsc needs an update/patch? I already started to make some changes (to get it closer to geotools and makes it easier to port to this later). So what do you thing about a new improvement "Move WMSC core classes to geotools library" so I can attach the patches to it.

Thanks,
Frank

2010/3/30 Frank Gasdorf <fgdrf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

All right. But after the post yesterday evening I got an answer that makes me happy! I still try udig against the new updated version of geowebcache and it seems to work quite well.

Thanks a lot

Frank

2010/3/30 Andrea Aime <aaime@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Frank Gasdorf ha scritto:

Hi Andrea,
thanks for the hint. I subscribed the mailing list and without confirming I posted the message. I also registered to nabble and I can see my message. But I will post it again. And your are right, without a message nobody can reply ;)

Mind, Nabble is funny sometimes, it shows you the message, but only
to you, though it should tell you in a yellow-ish box that the message
still hasn't landed on the mailing list.
In fact now that you've subscribed two copies of the same
message landed on the mailing list at one minute distance from
each other

Cheers
Andrea


--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

--0015173fe68818576604830066d4--