Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[udig-devel] Fwd: [jump-users] Re: Why uDig faster than OpenJUMP in importing shapefiles and, displaying them

FYI

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Larry Becker" <becker.larry@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: November 3, 2006 12:24:15 PM PST (CA)
To: "JUMP Users Discussion" <jump-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [jump-users] Re: Why uDig faster than OpenJUMP in importing shapefiles and, displaying them
Reply-To: JUMP Users Discussion <jump-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Actually, I just tried it with 1.1RC4 and it took about 7 seconds to initially add the benchmark shape file.  After it loaded up, it did redraw in about a second.  However, I was unable to get the table view to work on the file.  I also was unable to get theming to work or even basic feature selection, so there may be some downsides to the speed.

Could someone more knowledgeable about uDig try the benchmark and see if it was just my inexperience causing these problems?

Larry

On 11/3/06, Paul Ramsey <pramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Try the uDig benchmark with the 1.1RC series... should be even faster.

P

On 3-Nov-06, at 11:33 AM, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:

> Malte,
>
> I want to echo Larry's thanks for the benchmarl.
>
> 5X as slow. Man, that surprises me!
>
> Looks like we've got our work cut out for us.
>
> Does anyone remember the details about the problem Malte mentioned of
> OpenJUMP not freeing memeory after the layer is deleted. I'd really
> like to take a closer look at that problem if we haven't fixed it yet.
>
> SS
>
>
>
> On 11/3/06, Larry Becker <becker.larry@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
>> Hi Malte,
>>
>>   Thanks for the benchmark.  Looks like OJ has some room for
>> improvement.
>>
>> Larry Becker
>>
>> On 11/3/06, Malte Weller < MalteWeller@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hallo List,
>> >
>> > I tested the dataset with OpenJUMP 1.0.1 and uDig 1.0.6.
>> >
>> > OpenJump:
>> > 7 seconds for loading and 13 seconds for display.
>> >
>> > uDig:
>> > 4 seconds total.
>> >
>> > uDig is displaying the layer during the loading. It looks like
>> they use
>> > streaming as Martin said.
>> >
>> > But for me it is a bigger problem that I get  an Out of Memory
>> Error
>> > after deleting this layer and load it again.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure but seems that bug was mentioned sometimes before.
>> >
>> > Greetings,
>> > Malte
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > jump-users mailing list
>> > jump-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jump-users mailing list
>> jump-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jump-users mailing list
> jump-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users

_______________________________________________
jump-users mailing list
jump-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users

_______________________________________________
jump-users mailing list


Back to the top