[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] Problems with the quickstart
|
So if my goal is develop new plugins, it's better I use the SDK version. I
know that no SDK version involves a SVN checkout, but which are the reasons
to use SDK version?
*********************************************************************
Iñigo Telleria Elola wrote:
After reading the quickstart, I have followed all the steps to get a
build. But I have had some problems when I import the source code to
Eclipse. The uDig's fles have the names of the incorrect packages. For
example:
CGDICatalog.java is located in this package: package
net.refractions.udig.catalog.cgdi;
But in the "Package Explorer" I can see its package is
src.net.refractions.udig.catalog.cgdi.
I don't know why they have different names. I think that I have followed the
steps of quickstart correctly.
It looks like you are following the "Quickstart" that involves an SVN
checkout? There is also an "SDK Quickstart" if you are just interested in
developing plug-ins to extend uDig (it is a bit faster to set up and a lot
less trouble).
But lets work on your problem :-)
There is a page here that explains how to fix a broken build:
-<http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/How+to+fix+a+broken+build>
From the sounds of it you need to udpate the classpath .... right click on
the plug-in and select PDE > update classpath, you may as well update the
classpath for all plugins.
