Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Wayne, not sure I was aware of that
document ... or ... I was aware but have forgotten. 

The part of that document that I like
best is "Test and build dependencies may be grouped
together in a single contribution
questionnaire (CQ) "
 :) 

Perhaps the IP Team can help "pre-screen"
CQs and direct projects to do that grouping, if in fact the project agrees
 the rest of the conditions are met (i.e. not distributed, not in
scm, open source only, on build machine only, etc.). It would have made
it easier in this case to know what to review real carefully ... and which
were almost automatically ok (I guess the PMC then just has to sanity check,
that it is "open source", etc. -- I don't know, there might be
other cases of "incompatible licenses" ... but, don't think that
is PMC's responsibility to catch). 

Elemér, I don't mean to cause you even
more work than you've done already ... which, is a lot! But, it might help
to have your "build and test only, not distributed" items "grouped"
in one CQ, if you think it'd help you (and us) keep track of "current
status". 

Thanks again, 




From:      
 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,

Date:      
 10/07/2014 02:11 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [tools-pmc]
[CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review
Sent by:    
   tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

FYI,

https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/IP/Test_and_Build_Dependencies

TL;DR: Build and test dependencies can be classified as "works with"

Wayne

On 07/10/14 12:12 AM, David M Williams wrote:
Same as Bison, if this is a development time dependency
only, not checked into Git, and not distributed, then sounds ok as "works
with", to me. 
(I'm not even sure "development time only" dependencies are technically
"works with", or ... if there is some better classification ...
but, I believe as long as not put in Git repo, and not distributed with
project, that there are not many limits on "development time only"
tools.) 




From:        emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        10/03/2014 03:41 PM 
Subject:        [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39-
as "works with" exception to        full
IP review 
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8768


Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
changed:

          What    |Removed    
                |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Severity|new        
                |awaiting_pmc




--- Comment #3 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 2014-10-03 15:41:01 ---
Auto-Generated Text:  IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.


-- 
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc




_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

-- 
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation

_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc