Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review

Hi Doug,

 

Well, this is as far as the guidelines have taken us; definitely there are similar Linux libraries which we could list; I thought to add those which are contributing and influencing functionality.

But if you believe and all you agree these CQ’s are superficial, I’ll be more than happy to withdraw them.

 

Best regards

 

Elemer

 

 

From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug Schaefer
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 6:16 AM
To: David M Williams; Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review

 

If you haven't noticed, I'm not commenting at all on these. I've become quite dissillusioned in this process. I'm not sure why these guys just didn't CQ the Linux kernel too since these tools run there (sorry for the overstatement). Where do you draw the line? Who is this helping?

 

Doug.

From: David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Oct 07 2014 00:12:50 GMT-0400 (EDT)
To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to full IP review

Same as Bison, if this is a development time dependency only, not checked into Git, and not distributed, then sounds ok as "works with", to me.
(I'm not even sure "development time only" dependencies are technically "works with", or ... if there is some better classification ... but, I believe as long as not put in Git repo, and not distributed with project, that there are not many limits on "development time only" tools.)




From:        emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        10/03/2014 03:41 PM
Subject:        [tools-pmc] [CQ 8768] flex 2.5.39- as "works with" exception to        full IP review
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8768



Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
-------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
          Severity|new                         |awaiting_pmc




--- Comment #3 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2014-10-03 15:41:01 ---
Auto-Generated Text:  IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.


--
Configure CQmail:
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc


Back to the top