I think it would be beneficial if all tools sub-projects would use the same provider name and could - if desired - use a default icon, because:
1) Using a standardized provider name that reflects the Tools projects affiliation could help to make the top-level project structure more transparent to our community.
2) Infrastructure projects like GEF, which do not want to provide an own icon, could use the default icon. If a standardized (or at least default) provider name is used in addition, all projects using the default icon would be grouped together under the
Eclipse about dialog, reducing the clutter that is currently there (currently GEF uses the Modeling icon and default provider; but GEF is no modeling sub-project, so I would not expect it to do so).
What has to be decided thus is:
- Is it desired to standardize the provider name for all tools sub-projects or leave this open to sub-projects and only propose a default?
- Which 32-bit icon should be declared as the default icon (elipse-tools-Bildmarke32.png or PNG/elipse-tools-logo32.png) and what should be the standard (or the default) provider name ("Eclipse Tools", etc.)?
Please comment!
Best Regards
Alexander Nyßen
--
Dr. Alexander Nyßen
Dipl.-Inform.
Software-Engineer
Telefon: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-210
Telefax: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-211
Mobil: +49 (0) 151 / 17396743
itemis AG
Am Brambusch 15-24
44536 Lünen
Rechtlicher Hinweis:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621
Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens Trompeter, Sebastian Neus
Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael Neuhaus