The process hasn't changed. The PMI just provides a different means
of specifying the information for a release. The intent with
enabling the capture of review documentation in the release record
is that it should be easier to provide and maintain the information.
Projects are not obligated to use it; they can opt to provide review
materials in whatever form they choose. The existing requirements
for release documentation still apply.
HTH,
Wayne
On 05/30/2013 03:26 PM, David M
Williams wrote:
I certainly don't
object to GEF releasing,
and maybe I need to adjust to this new streamlined process, but
the release
review materials makes it look like a dead project.
No bugzilla reports ... no
mention of
of mailing lists or other community activity ... I am also
surprised the
difference between GEF, Draw2d and Zest components are not
described; just
to name a few.
So, don't mean to sound
judgmental,
I know we all want to minimize busy-work, but I'll abstain until
I see
a few more reports and get a better understanding of what's
expected.
From:
Anthony Hunter
<anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
"Tools PMC mailing
list" <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:
05/30/2013 12:47 PM
Subject:
[tools-pmc]
GEF 3.9.0 Release Review
Sent by:
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Tools PMC,
Please approve the release review for GEF 3.9.0.
The release review materials are at:
http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.gef/releases/3.9.0
The approved IP log is attached to:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=407597
Cheers...
Anthony_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
|