Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] Termination review for VE

Wayne,

 

Just kind remainder: VE is « release review » every year.

 

Best regards

Yves

From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 9:28 PM
To: tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] Termination review for VE

 

"All Projects are required to participate in at least one Review per year." (section 6.3)

A project needs to do either a release, restructuring, or continuation review every year. The only exception is that permanent incubator projects are not required to have reviews of any kind. We do a bad job of policing this. I have done a little work on some scripts that will help me identify those projects that need a review; I'll roll that out sometime soon...

Maybe we should take this opportunity to require that a projects (with the exception of permanent incubators) must do a *release* every year.

Thoughts?

Wayne

On 04/27/2011 03:12 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:

I’ll throw another thought into the mix, and maybe this should be input to the Eclipse Development Process. But I think the key criteria for a project at Eclipse to continue is that they promise to have official releases. If a project never releases, at least officially through the IP process, but still wants to keep the code alive, then maybe we should be encouraging to move it to somewhere a little less official, like Eclipse Labs. Would that be a better home for VE?

 

Doug.

 

From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 3:07 PM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: [tools-pmc] Termination review for VE

 

+1 ...

... as long as we remain sensitive to any needs/rampdown the project wants to do. I suggest we start the formal termination review, and if a literal archive is not desired then Yves (or other interested party) can turn it into a 'continuation review' ... explaining what the concrete plans are, etc.


Any (other) PMC member want to volunteer to draft the termination review document? I think source (or examples) could be "snagged" from recent cases that I did, if that helps. Found these searching this list:

Attachment: HibachiTerminationReview.odt
Attachment: HibachiTerminationReview.pdf
And then Cobol was before that ..
http://www.eclipse.org/project-slides/CobolTerminationReview .pdf



I did check cvs activity of VE for the past year, and I can't say its "zero" ... the top line in following "dash table" actually appears to be for "JEM" bundles, which have moved to WTP project (years ago).
I suspect the last substantial activity in July and November of last year ... perhaps "build related"? Getting up on latest Eclipse?

file:///home/davidw/Desktop/ve.png



Looking at bugzilla ... there are two that have been marked "fixed" in past year, both related to "build to the latest Eclipse", apparently.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?chfieldfrom=2010-06-15&chfieldto=Now&classification=Tools&product=VE&query_format=advanced&order=resolution%20DESC%2Cbug_id&query_based_on=


HTH



Inactive hide details for Jeff McAffer ---04/19/2011
              09:43:50 AM---+1 On 2011-04-19, at 9:38 AM, Schaefer, Doug
              wrote:Jeff McAffer ---04/19/2011 09:43:50 AM---+1 On 2011-04-19, at 9:38 AM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:

From: Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tools PMC mailing list <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04/19/2011 09:43 AM
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] FW: [ve-dev] Error installing VE-Update-1.5.0.zip
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




+1



On 2011-04-19, at 9:38 AM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:

Yes, John and I talked about that at EclipseCon. I think we’re ready. Let’s start the vote.

+1.

From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfMike Milinkovich
Sent:
Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:37 AM
To:
'Tools PMC mailing list'
Subject:
[tools-pmc] FW: [ve-dev] Error installing VE-Update-1.5.0.zip

Esteemed Tools PMC,

Can we please please pretty please archive this project?

Especially now with WindowBuilder in full development, I see no reason to avoid end-of-lifing VE.


From: ve-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ve-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Denny Vriesman
Sent:
April-19-11 9:32 AM
To:
ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[ve-dev] Error installing VE-Update-1.5.0.zip


Hello EveryOne,

I’ve Just downloaded “eclipse-rcp-helios-SR2-win32.zip” from eclipse website.
After that I’ve downloaded VE-Update-1.5.0.zip for Helios, in agreement with the site: “http://www.eclipse.org/vep/”, and I try to install it.

But, for my surprise, there is an error on the installation:

The artifact file for osgi.bundle,org.eclipse.ve.cde,1.5.0.R20101202-1328 was not found.
session context was:(profile="" phase=org.eclipse.equinox.internal.p2.engine.phases.Install, operand=null --> [R]org.eclipse.ve.cde 1.5.0.R20101202-1328, action="">
Please, have somebody the solution for this problem ? Is a VE a discontinuous or deprecated project ? Have anyone noted that problem until now ?

Thank you in Advance,
Denny Richard San Vriesman
Analista de Suporte
Softplan Planejamento de Sistemas Ltda
Sistema da Qualidade Certificado ISO 9001:2000
Fone: (48) 3027-8000
http://www.softplan.com.br

_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

 
 
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

Back to the top