Re: [tools-pmc] [objectteams-dev] Requesting exception for patchfeature

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Stephan!

In terms of verbosity, I'd suggest being as verbose as you find helpful
for yourself (ie as reminder for your team).

That should help keeping your own effort lower, and keep the document
concise so readers save time. Reviewers will ask when there's anything
unclear. Better initiate a discussion rather than giving the impression
of too much clarity (while missing a detail).

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

-----Original Message-----
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephan Herrmann
Sent: Donnerstag, 18. November 2010 17:53
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] [objectteams-dev] Requesting exception for
patchfeature shipped by Object Teams

Martin,

On Thursday, November 18, 2010 04:40:32 pm Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> [...]
> Long story short, [...] But I do
> think it'll be valuable to go and explain the technical details and 
> issues. At least for the mutual education of all of us, and who knows?
> Perhaps a solution comes up.

Jumping right to it: I'm in the middle of documenting some of the
details at http://wiki.eclipse.org/OTJdtCore It's good to have that
documentation anyway.
I'm struggling to find the right level of detail, so probably its both
too verbose and missing essential parts. I hope the structure lets you
pick those aspects that are needed.

I'll give you another ping when I'm done with the first draft and then
answer to a fewer other items in your mail.

Thanks,
Stephan
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc