Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [Fwd: Re: [tools-pmc] Request approval for Greg Watson as Photran committer]

It was certified. Please proceed.

Thanks,
Doug. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Webmaster (Karl Matthias) [mailto:webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:13 PM
To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Tools PMC mailing list'; 'Anne Jacko'; Greg Watson; Schaefer, Doug
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [tools-pmc] Request approval for Greg Watson as
Photran committer]

Hey guys,

I'm not sure how I can answer this more clearly than I have in all the
previous emails.  I cannot post to the tools-pmc list.  As I said in
previous emails, all that needs to happen is that the PMC needs to
certify the email election that was run.  Then send a note to webmaster
and I'll take it from there, working with our legal folks.  Since I
cannot post to the PMC list, if this needs to be posted there, then
please relay this information.  I already emailed Doug S sometime early
last week in response to his question about this.  Greg I am sorry this
has not been clear from my previous notes.

Cheers,
Karl


Mike Milinkovich wrote:
>
> I am sure we can figure something out to provision your commit rights.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Is there any way that I can get commit access in the mean time? 
>
>  
>
> *From: *"Webmaster (Karl Matthias)" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> Hey Doug,
>
> There is a problem in this one situation with the lack of complete 
> Portal support for third level sub-projects/components.  We asked them

> to conduct just this one election on the mailing list as doing so in 
> the Portal required us doing some bad things to the database.  This 
> problem is caused by the fact that the existing Photran committers are

> not committers on PTP (this is an unusual situation).  Existing Portal

> support in the election code for components relied on the 
> committerships being a the sub-project level (how it used to be). 
>  That has changed but the code has not.  The plan is for that to get 
> fixed this quarter.  Thanks for checking with us on it.
>
>  
>



Back to the top