Thanks, John for correcting. Now that that’s
cleared up…
+1
From:
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Duimovich
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:09
AM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Cc: 'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] Vote for
EMF and GEF moving to the modeling project
-1 on GEF (must have been a typo)...
I
recast the question and add my vote...
+1
on the following
EMF
(and XSD) and UML2 have been commandeered by the new Modeling project.
Despite reservations over the process of such commandeering, I am fully behind
the move. Having a strong Modeling PMC with these key senior projects a part of
it is good for Eclipse in the modeling space as a whole.
John
|
Doug Schaefer
<DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>
Sent
by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/09/2006 09:27 PM
|
Please
respond to
Tools PMC mailing list
|
|
|
To
|
Tools PMC mailing list
<tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
"'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'"
<bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
Subject
|
[tools-pmc] Vote for EMF and GEF moving to
the modeling project
|
|
EMF and GEF have been commandeered by the new Modeling project. Despite
reservations over the process of such commandeering, I am fully behind the
move. Having a strong Modeling PMC with these key senior projects a part of it
is good for Eclipse in the modeling space as a whole.
+1
from me.
Doug
Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse
CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC member
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
