He may be a forgotten initial committer, but there's plenty of reputation demonstrated in the commit record (see below), so that's not really an issue. I recommend that we approve this election.
Literally the first commit that I looked at when I visited the repository was authored by this committer.
As a note to the project team, our practice/expectation is that committers provide specific information in nomination statements; include pointers to specific contributions when possible.
The nominee has made 35 meaningful contributions according to the short log:
ucas Biaggi (35):
feat(gitlab-external-refs): Extract file sha using GitLab API
docs: Add code of conduct
docs: Add review process details to contrib
feat(misc): Add docker image with gitlint
feat: Add CI stage to build git linter image
feat(ci): Enable git commit lint stage
docs(gitlab): Add default template for MRs
fix: correct data-store link.
docs: update trudag usage
feat(trudag): sort dotstop graph
fix: broken tests affected by sorting content
chore(release): Update NEWS.md
chore: Update pyproject.toml file to new release
fix: evaluate call for --help before anything.
feat: Ignore file for factory builder
feat: Remote graph
test: Add remote graph related tests
fix: Remove old remote tests
fix: issues in FakeItem class
chore: Release 2025.07.23
fix: Incorrect default value for remote dest
chore(release): Release notes for v2025.08.05
feat: merge graphs only with normative local items
fix(cli): call for --help is evaluated correctly
fix(report): Remove emoji plugin
docs: Refine guidance in TT-EXPECTATIONS
docs: Add remote graph desc and goals
feat(graphalyzer): Tweak sensitivity output
feat(trudag/score): sensitivity analysis function
feat(trudag/publish): Add sensitivity analysis
fix(trudag/publish): table with indentation
test(publish/sensitivity): Add new tests
docs: fixes BaseGraph typos
docs: update usage docs
feat(trudag/publish): Sensitivity aggregation
HTH,
Wayne
