Re: [technology-pmc] (no subject)

[Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxx>]

thanks

Is setting Status RESOLVED and Resolution WORKSFORME the intended way to signal a works-with CQ has been approved ?

Using WORKSFORME seems really strange to me, see my comment https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20517#c8

and definition of WORKSFORME in https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html#resolution

Same question for this sibling CQ https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20518

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:16 PM Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I +1 both. However, 20518 wasn't in ataiting_pmc state. Not sure what IPzilla is doing here. :)

-Gunnar

--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/


> On Sep 4, 2019, at 13:39, Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi PMC,
>
> can you please +1 the following "works-with" CQs?
> JGit wants to use JMH to run benchmarks.
>
> These CQs are now sitting in ipzilla since Aug 4, any reason why they seem to be stuck ?
>
> jmh-core version 1.21
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20517
> jmh-generator-annprocess version 1.21
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20518
>
> -Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc