Hi PMC,
I'd like to
point you to our review documentation [1] for the 1.0
release of
e(fx)clipse.
With 1.0 we'd also like to leave Incubation status
and graduate to a
proper Eclipse project who follows API guidelines,
... .
Some highlights:
* We fully support Eclipse Luna and e4
Luna Platform
* We fixed a total number of 104 bugs/feature requests
*
We managed to attract devlopers who provided code contributions
* We
saw commercial adoption of our codebase
The IP-Log has been
submitted to the IP-Team today.
Something I'm uncertain and you
might be able to clarify is that I
somehow remember that Technology
only has Incubation projects and I need
to find a new Top-Level home
for e(fx)clipse. Is that still valid?
The problem I see in case I
have to find another Top-Level project is
that we have a strong
binding to Tooling AND Runtime so the Tools
Top-Level project does
not feel like the right component, nor does the
RT-Project.
If
you like to get more informations about the upcoming features I'd
like
to point you to my blog [2] where I'll go through 1.0 feature one
by
one including screenshots, ... .
Now that we shipped 1.0, we'll
return to 6-8 week *release* cycles so
expect more reviews in the
months to come and naturally we'll join the
Mars release train.
Tom
[1]
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.efxclipse/releases/1.0.0/review[2]
http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/tag/release-efxclipse-1-0/_______________________________________________
technology-pmc
mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo
change your delivery
options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
