Re: [technology-pmc] Termination review request for Faceted Project Fram

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I need a short document that basically states the state of being that
has lead to the termination with description of what needs to happen.

Here's some examples:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Technology/Subproject_Termination_Review_2010
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=185176

Frankly, I think the first one contain enough information. The second
one is more than we need. Ultimately, it comes down to what you think
needs to be said.

Once you have that, we can schedule. After the review, we'll open a bug
and copy webmaster who will make all the magic happen.

Wayne

On 03/22/2011 08:46 AM, konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Agreed. Would have been nice. Project terminations aren't easy,
> especially when there is a lot of potential in technology, but no
> resources to drive that forward.
>
> Wayne,
>
> Do you need anything else from me in order to schedule the review?
>
> - Konstantin
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Chris Aniszczyk
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 1:28 PM
> To: Technology PMC
> Cc: Konstantin Komissarchik
> Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Termination review request for Faceted
> Project Framework project
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik
> <konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Indeed. Thanks for the summary, Wayne. This project was supposed to be a
>> next-gen fork of facets technology out of WTP. Both to improve API
>> and to be
>> better positioned for wider adoption. The eventual plan was to have a
>> backwards compatibility layer for 1.x API.
>
> +0
>
> There's still a lot of clients that used the faceted project
> framework... would have been nice to see an evolution.
>