Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] [CQ 3706] binutils Version: any

+1

On 1/20/10 1:13 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Greetings noble Technology PMC members.

The Linux Tools project has requested exempt pre-req status for binutils, a collection of components that are a common part of all (most?) Linux distributions. I believe that this request is in-line with our policies regarding the use of third-party dependencies and established precedent. The CQ link is noted below. I've copied the text of the request as well (a later comment qualifies the request for "_exempt_ pre-req" status.

If you have any issues with this, please raise them now. Alternatively, please give this request a +1.

Thanks,

Wayne

Committer: Andrew Overholt overholt@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> https://foundation.eclipse.org/people/people_edit.php?PersonID=aoverholt

Project:        technology.linux-distros
http://foundation.eclipse.org/projects/projects_edit.php?ProjectID=technology.linux-distros

Name:           binutils
Version:        any
Description:    Our gprof and gcov components require the functionality
provided by the binutils programs (addr2line, c++filt, etc.). This is a very common set of programs, available on all Linux distributions. If someone has
gcc installed, they will have these installed.

Can we mark this as a \"pre-req\" dependency of Linux Tools?

Cryptography:   No

License(s):     GNU General Public License (GPL) v3

Project URL:    Source URL:




emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3706


Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx |barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx
           Severity|new                         |awaiting_pmc




--- Comment #5 from Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-01-19 11:19:12 ---
Thanks Andrew and Xavier!

PMC, please discuss on the technology PMC mailing list, and update this CQ with
your collective vote after the discussion concludes.



Auto-Generated Text:  IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.





Back to the top