Re: [technology-pmc] [CQ 3706] binutils Version: any

[Eric Rizzo <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

On 1/20/10 1:13 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> Greetings noble Technology PMC members.
>
> The Linux Tools project has requested exempt pre-req status for 
> binutils, a collection of components that are a common part of all 
> (most?) Linux distributions. I believe that this request is in-line 
> with our policies regarding the use of third-party dependencies and 
> established precedent. The CQ link is noted below. I've copied the 
> text of the request as well (a later comment qualifies the request for 
> "_exempt_ pre-req" status.
>
> If you have any issues with this, please raise them now. 
> Alternatively, please give this request a +1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
> > Committer:     Andrew Overholt overholt@xxxxxxxxxx 
> > <mailto:overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >                
> > https://foundation.eclipse.org/people/people_edit.php?PersonID=aoverholt
> >
> > Project:        technology.linux-distros
> >                
> > http://foundation.eclipse.org/projects/projects_edit.php?ProjectID=technology.linux-distros 
> >
> >
> > Name:           binutils
> > Version:        any
> > Description:    Our gprof and gcov components require the functionality
> > provided by the binutils programs (addr2line, c++filt, etc.).  This 
> > is a very
> > common set of programs, available on all Linux distributions.  If 
> > someone has
> > gcc installed, they will have these installed.
> >
> > Can we mark this as a \"pre-req\" dependency of Linux Tools?
> >
> > Cryptography:   No
> >
> > License(s):     GNU General Public License (GPL) v3
> >
> > Project URL:    Source URL:
>
>
>
>
> emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
> >
> >
> > Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
> >
> >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >
> >          AssignedTo|emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx     
> > |barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >            Severity|new                         |awaiting_pmc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from Barb Cochrane <barb.cochrane@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > 2010-01-19 11:19:12 ---
> > Thanks Andrew and Xavier!
> >
> > PMC, please discuss on the technology PMC mailing list, and update 
> > this CQ with
> > your collective vote after the discussion concludes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Auto-Generated Text:  IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.