Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

It has nothing to do with sensors/computing. You can set an average extra consumer power in the battery device settings, but this is not influenced by the CFM.

 

 

 

-----Original-Nachricht-----

Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

Datum: 2022-08-08T15:28:43+0200

Von: "Radha Reddy" <radha.reddy.ipp@xxxxxxxxx>

An: "m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 

 

 

Many thanks Mirko,
 
 
You mean both ACC and Krauss vehicles are electric vehicles ( After switching all vehicles to electric engine, the ACC vehicle consumes only 0.4% more than the leading Krauss vehicle )?
 
In my scenarios, I let Krauss be the ICEV/BEV and ACC be the BEAV. I tested two scenarios 1. Mixed ICEV (Krauss) and BEV (Krauss) and 2. Mixed ICEV (Krauss) and BEVs (ACC) for an hour simulation. Finally, I have considered the average result of one simulation hour and compared the battery electricity consumption. So I tried checking how individual vehicles consume when there are no traffic signals assigned (free flow) by mixing ICEV/BEV and Krauss/ACC.
 
I got the results of ACC BEV being the highest electricity consumer 8.8Wh than the Krauss BEV in the signal-free road. My question is if this high consumption is related to the sensors/computing or the higher speed of ACC?
 
I am sorry for asking the same question.
 
Regards
Radha

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well I don't see that much of weird behaviour in this example. After switching all vehicles to electric engine, the ACC vehicle consumes only 0.4% more than the leading Krauss vehicle. It drives faster for some time also when it wants to overtake. By the way: You used a lane change parameter (lcLaneDiscipline) belonging to the sublane model but didn't activate that one.

 

Best regards

Mirko

 

 

 

-----Original-Nachricht-----

Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

Datum: 2022-08-08T11:31:27+0200

Von: "Radha Reddy" <radha.reddy.ipp@xxxxxxxxx>

An: "m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 

 

 

Hello Mirko,
 
Please check the attached zip file, in which I have attached a different network file, a 2x2 grid network of intersections in which only 3 vehicles are injected using flow definition (2 HVs - Krauss CFM and 1 AV - ACC CFM). I assigned only the green light to let these 3 vehicles pass without stopping. All vehicles cross straight at intersection 0, turn right at intersection 2, cross straight at intersection 3, and exit the network.
 
We can observe the weird behavior of the ACC vehicle at intersection 2 when it turns right side.
 
REgards
Radha

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 10:16 AM m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Radha,

 

I would like to take a closer look on your example scenario. Do you want to share the files?

 

Best regards

Mirko

 

 

 

-----Original-Nachricht-----

Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

Datum: 2022-08-08T10:09:41+0200

Von: "Radha Reddy" <radha.reddy.ipp@xxxxxxxxx>

An: "m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sumo project User discussions" <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 

 

 

Many thanks Mirko, for your information.
 
My test network is an isolated intersection with each road from the intersection being 500meters in length. My intention was how the human-driven (Krauss) and Autonomous-driven (ACC) vehicles consume battery electricity. The human vehicle exhibits jerky driving behavior while the autonomous vehicle utilizes its maximum speed without jerky behavior.
 
The electricity consumption of ACC is strange that in the straight lane, it consumes ~0.57 while turning to the right/left, consuming 20 times extra from 10 to 15 (for 3 to 4 seconds, the time required to cross the intersection). In Krauss CFM, it is of utmost 5 and recovers some energy when there is a jerk.
 
In the literature, the higher electricity consumption of autonomous vehicles is related to the power consumption of sensors and computing for autonomous driving. My question is if the ACC has a similar explanation.
 
Regards
Radha

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:48 AM m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

 

these are different CFM generating different speed profiles. So it should be expected that electricity consumption may differ. The difference does not sound very big either, as it is in the range of a few % of an average consumption per km. Still depends on how your test network looks like, though.

 

Best regards

Mirko

 

 

 

 

-----Original-Nachricht-----

Betreff: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

Datum: 2022-08-06T23:04:43+0200

Von: "Radha Reddy" <radha.reddy.ipp@xxxxxxxxx>

An: "Sumo project User discussions" <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 

 

 

Hello,
 
I have two scenarios in which Battery Electric Vehicles are driven by Krauss CFM (Human driver) and ACC CFM (Autonomous driver). When I compared the electricity consumption results, the ACC-driven vehicles consumed more than the Krauss CFM (between 2 to 7Wh), Is there any explanation for this?
 
Many thanks in advance.
 
Regards
Radha
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user


Back to the top