Re: [sumo-user] How to controll multiple connections to the same sumo se

[cchadj01@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hello,
 That covers me.

Thank you for your time!

Quoting Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>:

> No, that is currently not supported. You will have to ensure that all
> clients play along.
> In fact, all clients should be structured around a loop as below:
>
> while keepRunning():
>    optionallyDoStuff()
>    traci.simulationStep()
>
> If you need to coordinate among the clients, you could use the getParameter
> / setParameter API  (e.g. on the ego vehicle, a POI or some other
> pre-selected simulation object) to exchange arbitrary information.
>
>
>
> 2018-08-09 16:53 GMT+02:00 <cchadj01@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hello,
> >  Thank your for the answer!
> >  I tried that and it indeed gives the turn to the other client,
> >  the other client freezes on the next traci command until control is
> > released.
> >
> >  What if the client doesn't want to give up the turn and make a couple of
> > simulation
> >  steps without losing control?
> >  I think I could use  traci.SimulationStep(anyNumberOfSteps)but that
> > wouldn't allow me to dynamically change the state of the simulation (except
> > with the use
> > of listeners).
> >  Is there a way to make multiple single simulation steps without losing
> > control?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > Quoting Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > To give up the turn, the client can just call traci.simulationStep()
> > > regards,
> > > Jakob
> > >
> > > 2018-08-09 12:12 GMT+02:00 <cchadj01@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > >  I have a Sumo server fire up from sumo-gui.exe from the command line
> > > > like
> > > > so:
> > > >  sumo-gui.exe -c simpgrid.sumocfg --remote-port 9999 --num-clients 2
> > > >
> > > >  I have a client in python and I want to connect two of them at the same
> > > > server.
> > > >  I do so and set then the connection1.setOrder(1) for the first client
> > > > and
> > > > connection1.setOrder(2)
> > > >  for the second one.
> > > >  This works properly but I noticed that you can send a number of requests
> > > > from the first client
> > > >  and then the other clients just waits until it is its turn to send
> > > > requests.
> > > >
> > > >  I was wondering if a client can give up its turn if it doesn't need to
> > > > send any requests at the
> > > >  given moment.
> > > >  I want to do this in order to send only some commands from the second
> > > > client and have the first
> > > >  client do most of the work.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Tom
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > sumo-user mailing list
> > > > sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> > > > from this list, visit
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sumo-user mailing list
> > sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> > from this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user