|
Hello Biörn,
First of all - there are two modes for these dialogs:
1) Table-based
2) "Synchronize view"-based
They're being controled by the option
"Window->Preferences->Team->SVN->Show selected
resources in resouce changes pane".
If there was model support - it could only be implemented for the
second mode, since the first one does not provide required visual
facilities.
And now the second point: I checked the code - it seems like the
resource selection panel's code is founded on the same base as the
Synchronize View support, but it still does not show models. There
are two reasons possible: something is not finished or the models
are disabled for some reason.
Regarding estimate - unfortunately I can't give it yet: since the
code was made when I wasn't working on the project, I should spend
a little more time to understand how it actually works and why it
does not work as expected.
Best regards,
Alexander.
29.06.2012 16:06, Biörnstad, Biörn пишет:
Dear Alexander,
In the mean-time, we have started implementing a prototype for
the Model side of the Logical Model Integration framework. The
synchronization view now shows our model.
However, the dialogs shown by Subversive actions like commit,
revert or lock do not show any model objects. From the logging
output of my classes, it seems that Subversive is not trying
to show our model. For example, I would expect my
ModelProvider to be consulted when trying to commit some
resources.
So, my question is: do the mentioned dialogs attempt to show
model content? If yes, can you give me any hints on what I
could be doing wrong? If no, can you estimate the effort of
adding the corresponding functionality to Subversive?
Thanks,
Biörn
Hello Biörn,
There is a list of an partially unimplemented or implemented
not in the best possible way features:
- Provide access to remote configurations using the
Eclipse File System API in the
org.eclipse.core.filesystem plug-in and link
this to workspace projects through the
ProjectSetCapability
(not all methods were implemented)
- IChangeGroupingRequestor (probably is implemented not
in the best way)
At first glance it is all I could find. Is there something
else that prevents you from using Subversive as part of your
product?
Best regards,
Alexander Gurov
Subversive Team.
01.06.2011 14:54, Biörnstad, Biörn пишет:
Dear all,
I would like to ask you what the status of
Subversive's support for Logical Model Integration
(LMI) is, in particular which of the steps in [1] have
been completed for Subversive.
The only information I could find on the topic was
the Subversive New and Noteworthy for Galileo [2],
which states that you have put much effort into
supporting LMI. The corresponding bug even states that
"... almost all Team API is implemented". However,
prototypes on our side did not manage to uncover the
complete support of LMI.
In our project, we want to integrate Subversive in
our Eclipse product. A special requirement is that
end-users will work exclusively with model objects and
never see the corresponding workspace resources.
Therefore, we would rely on a relatively complete
support of LMI on the part of the Team provider. We
are considering implementing missing Subversive
features if necessary and contributing these back to
the project.
Thanks
Biörn
[1]
http://help.eclipse.org/helios/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/guide/team_model_repo.htm
[2]
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Subversive_New_and_Noteworthy_for_Galileo
_______________________________________________
subversive-dev mailing list
subversive-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/subversive-dev
_______________________________________________
subversive-dev mailing list
subversive-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/subversive-dev
|
