If eBPM is being maintained, why is it not being maintained in
the Eclipse project?
Wayne
Hi Wayne,
My answer are inline to yours question :
Il 19/05/16 03:44, Wayne Beaton ha scritto:
I eBPM being maintained in Spagic?
Yes it's and it will be, because Spagic that is based on top of
eBPM is deployed *in production* to customers in real projects.
So it will continue to live in company internal SVN repository /
or in another location that we're going to decide.
I don't recall the dual licensing discussion. There is no
discussion of this in the project proposal [1]. Can you
describe how you mean "double licensed"?
It means that eBPM inisde eclispe is licensed with EPL, but it's
also licensed as LGPL that is the Spagic License. ( Obviously the
LGPL code
is not the one in the eclispe SVN repository ).
I don't understand what you're asking about the Intermediate
Model.
The answer is the same that is valid for your first question,
Spagic depends on eBPM, and eBPM depends on Intermediate Model, so
we need to ensure that Intermediate Model will continue to live in
our internal repository until we remove code dependency from it's
code base.
Regards
Andrea
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
