+1
just one comment: You may want to talk about the Mangrove project instead of the STP Intermediate Model.
Zsolt
Am 22.01.2010 um 03:32 schrieb Anne Jacko: Thanks, Wayne, We are still waiting to hear from Mike and the SOA PMC. Anne Jacko emo@xxxxxxxxxxxOn Jan 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote: The proposal has been updated.
With this update, +1 from me.
Wayne
Angelo Bernabei wrote:
Dear All,
at this time, there isn't any source code for eBAM, we are just
starting to develop it.
So we can change the release version to 0.7 , as you suggested.
Tell me if you prefer that I send you a new proposal.
Regards
Angelo
Wayne Beaton ha scritto:
Anne, can you please add a section for mentors with TBD for
contents? Also, there is at least one reference to "the newsgroup"
that should be changed to "the discussion forum" in the text.
Angelo, you provide a 2010-08 proposed date for 1.0 release. A 1.0
release is a pretty significant event for an Eclipse project.
Completely new projects start in incubation; while in incubation,
only pre-1.0 release are possible. Perhaps a ~0.7 release makes
more sense. If you already have a significant amount of code with
APIs that are quite stable, then maybe we can entertain a 1.0
release in this time frame. If this is the case, then I'd like to
see some discussion of the existing code as part of an "Initial
Code Contribution" section. That section should include some words
that state that the code base is already mature with stable APIs.
Does this seem reasonable?
Wayne
Anne Jacko wrote:
Hello Wayne, Mike, SOA PMC --
Please review and comment on this draft proposal:
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/ebam/
Thanks.
Anne Jacko
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org
I'm going to EclipseCon!
http://www.eclipsecon.org
_______________________________________________ soa-pmc mailing list soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
|
