Philip,
No. Each product in the release is being released separately with their own product definitions, features and download sites.
The steering committee has previously discussed (as in last year) that we would wait until the TLP was in place before we would deal with the larger issues around a single Eclipse Science Workbench with an overarching product and feature. Some of these larger issues include:
*The name (because people argue over that the most)
*What happens to our existing standalone products with their own workbenches (ICE, DAWN, Chemclipse, etc.)?
*What about "look and feel?"
*What about branding?
*What about all the normal issues facing an Eclipse project (website, documentation, etc.)?
So, yeah, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. The best that we can do for the fall release is to start developing dependencies on a common stack, which at the moment is formed by January, EAVP, Triquetrum, EASE, and PTP. I think Rich Beans might be the next to join that common core.
Jay
